Wallchain MetaSwapWrapper
Paladin reviewed Wallchain (Wallchain MetaSwapWrapper) on 4 May 2023: 9 findings, 0 critical; all marked fixed.
No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Wallchain’s security record
Report stored on IPFS. Content hash QmWX2pCiiawA9f6jSqfC7taQJSmgpt4Dm8uXzV83GcunMe
Trustblock does not review code.
Findings9
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Low | 0 | 0 | 6 |
HighContract structure allows for an exploiter to drain all open approvals to the MetaSwapWrapperFixed
The report gives no description here.
MediumETH to ETH wrapped transactions will fully failFixed
The report gives no description here.
MediumUsers will lose value through many router interactions including transferTokensForExactTokens due to input dust being stuck in the wrapperFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowContract does not work for non-compliant ERC20 tokens like USDT on EthereumFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowContract might not work for non-EOA sendersFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowGas optimizationsFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowLack of validationFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowTypographical errorsFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowwithdrawETH might fail due to the use of transfer instead of callFixed
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope2
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0x4def20e7dbfeab6b2cfeb53bdca28a6dced12317 | Chain: BNB Chain | Source code: Verified source |
| 0x4def20e7dbfeab6b2cfeb53bdca28a6dced12317 | Chain: Polygon (POS) | Source code: Verified source |
Part of Wallchain’s security record
WallchainAudits3 audits by 1 firmLast audit Sep 2023, by Paladin.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross 3 reports.
Open Wallchain’s security recordSecurity firm
Paladin176 projects reviewed · 241 reports · latest Apr 2025
See Paladin’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us