CertiK reviewed Shrub (Shrub token) on 29 Nov 2024: 12 findings, 0 critical; 1 marked fixed, 10 acknowledged, 1 open.
Report hosted on skynet.certik.com.
Trustblock does not review code.
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Medium | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Low | 0 | 9 | 0 |
In the contract `Contract`, the role `_owner` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram below. Any compromise to the `_owner` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority and set automated market maker pair, exclude accounts from fees, update the developer wallet address, update the maximum transaction amount, enable trading and swap, set the launch block number, disable transfer delay, update the buy fees, blacklist or whitelist an account, set early sell tax status, update maximum wallet amount, update sell fees with a safety check, update swap enabled status, exclude an address from max transaction amount, update the marketing wallet address, remove limits in effect, and update swap tokens amount.  In the contract `Ownable`, the role `_owner` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram below. Any compromise to the `_owner` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority and renounce the ownership or transfer contract ownership.  ### Onchain Analysis As of November 29, 2024, the contract is deployed at [0x3b991130eaE3CcA364406D718DA22FA1C3E7C256](https://etherscan.io/address/0x3b991130eae3cca364406d718da22fa1c3e7c256), and its ownership has been renounced through the transaction [0xd387c226e6d70a827d9dd33bb70bf5980f9dd3a1af9e748c552acd9c1ff122e9](https://etherscan.io/tx/0xd387c226e6d70a827d9dd33bb70bf5980f9dd3a1af9e748c552acd9c1ff122e9).
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0x3b99…c2560x3b991130eae3cca364406d718da22fa1c3e7c256 | Chain: Ethereum | Source code: Verified source |
1,044 projects reviewed · 1,375 reports · latest May 2025
See CertiK’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us