Namada Ethereum Bridge audit
Oak Security reviewed Anoma (Namada Ethereum Bridge audit) on 28 Mar 2023: 12 findings, 2 critical; 9 marked fixed, 3 acknowledged.
1 critical acknowledged, not fixed
Findings12
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| High | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 0 | 1 | 4 |
CriticalMissing replay protection for signaturesAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
HighSlashable offense for voting on an unconfirmed event is not accounted as misbehaviorAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowSmart contract hub can upgrade contracts to an already used contract addressAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope
No deployed address is recorded for this audit.
The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.
Part of Anoma’s security record
AnomaAudits2 audits by 2 firmsLast audit Nov 2025, by Nethermind Security.
Critical findings1 critical acknowledged, not fixedReported in “Namada Ethereum Bridge audit” by Oak Security, Mar 2023. The team acknowledged it.
Open Anoma’s security recordSecurity firm
Oak Security33 projects reviewed · 60 reports · latest May 2026
See Oak Security’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us