Namada Ethereum Bridge audit
Oak Security reviewed Anoma (Namada Ethereum Bridge audit) on 28 Mar 2023: 12 findings, 2 critical; 9 marked fixed, 3 acknowledged.
Findings12
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| High | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 0 | 1 | 4 |
CriticalEthereum events are not correctly confirmedFixed
The report gives no description here.
HighBridging tokens from Ethereum to Namada with an invalid amount of receiver addresses will freeze escrowed fundsFixed
The report gives no description here.
HighIncorrect accounting of voting power for Ethereum eventsFixed
The report gives no description here.
HighOracle uses an unbounded queue which might lead to out-of-memory issuesFixed
The report gives no description here.
HighThe minimum number of block confirmations required to bridge ERC20 tokens from Ethereum to Namada is not enforcedFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowThe minimum number of block confirmations required to bridge ERC20 tokens from Ethereum to Namada is not enforcedFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowThe total size in bytes of the transactions in a block proposal can exceed the block byte size limitFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowUnsafe use of selfdestructFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowValidator set update protocol transactions are not validated in the process proposal phaseFixed
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope
No deployed address is recorded for this audit.
The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.
Part of Anoma’s security record
AnomaSecurity firm
Oak Security33 projects reviewed · 60 reports · latest May 2026
See Oak Security’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us