Gangster City
Audit · firm’s term: audit report
HashEx reviewed Gangster City on 3 Feb 2022: 16 findings, 0 critical; 13 marked fixed, 2 acknowledged, 1 open.
Trustblock does not review code.
Findings16
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Medium | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Low | 0 | 1 | 6 |
HighIf the contract runs out of reward tokens users' NFTs may be lockedFixed
No description was provided.
HighNot minted yet token can be stakedFixed
No description was provided.
HighSigned data can be replicatedFixed
No description was provided.
HighunstakeWorker() can be applied to the same token multiple timesFixed
No description was provided.
HighUnstaking by an arbitrary userFixed
No description was provided.
MediumRewards can be claimed for an unstaked tokenFixed
No description was provided.
MediumUnbeneficial random seeds can be ignoredFixed
No description was provided.
LowGas optimisationFixed
No description was provided.
LowNo eventsFixed
No description was provided.
LowNo eventsFixed
No description was provided.
Show 3 more
LowNo parameters checkFixed
No description was provided.
LowPayable modifier is redundantFixed
No description was provided.
LowRoyalty fees may exceed 100%Fixed
No description was provided.
Contracts in scope4
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0x6ec1a31a92b9724cfeb71f135c4563d8e8f06585 | Chain: Avalanche | Source code: Verified source |
| 0xcbb55b9bfeae51eda8fe7f39e09ecd88c4b4bb46 | Chain: Avalanche | Source code: Verified source |
| 0xeda770856191f16ac54d3181b2bac8af0c485b72 | Chain: Avalanche | Source code: Verified source |
| 0x87e8aee88ae939465da795d6c32963854bb5fba0 | Chain: Avalanche | Source code: Verified source |
Part of Gangster City’s security record
Gangster CitySecurity firm
HashEx118 projects reviewed · 159 reports · latest Feb 2025
See HashEx’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us