Abstract Module Bases, Proxy and Manager Contracts

Oak SecurityCode version: not recorded (see the report)

Oak Security reviewed Abstract (Abstract Module Bases, Proxy and Manager Contracts) on 9 May 2023: 10 findings, 0 critical; 7 marked fixed, 3 acknowledged.

No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Abstract’s security record

Report hosted on GitHub.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings10

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High011
Medium000
Low026

Marked Informational by the firm. Not counted as findings.

InformationalContracts should implement a two-step ownership transferFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalGovernance type implementation diverges from documentationFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalIncorrect commentsFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalInsufficient validation to hinder off-chain attacksFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalMisleading message namesFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalOverflow checks not enabled for release profileFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalQuerying configuration does not return subscriptor’s addressFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalRemove duplicate permission checkingFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalSudo messages are not exportedFixed

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of Abstract’s security record

Abstract
Audits2 audits by 1 firmLast audit Dec 2024, by Oak Security.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross the 2 reports, 1 critical finding was reported. It is marked fixed by the firm that reported it.
Open Abstract’s security record

Security firm

Oak Security

33 projects reviewed · 60 reports · latest May 2026

See Oak Security’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us