Anito

HashExCode version: not recorded (see the report)

Audit · firm’s term: audit report

HashEx reviewed Anito Legends (Anito) on 14 Jun 2022: 24 findings, 1 critical; 6 marked fixed, 13 acknowledged, 5 open.

1 critical finding, fixed
Open the reportOpen Anito Legends’s security record

Report hosted on hashex.org.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings24

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical001
High202
Medium123
Low2110
MediumExcessive owner's rightsAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

MediumNo guarantees the reward contract has enough tokensAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowGas optimizationAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowGas optimizationAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowGas optimizationAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowGas optimizationAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowGas optimizationAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowGas optimizationAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowmassUpdate flag is optionalAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowNo eventsAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

Show 3 more
LowNo eventsAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowNo eventsAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowNo support of tokens with commissionsAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of Anito Legends’s security record

Anito Legends
Audits2 audits by 1 firmLast audit Oct 2022, by HashEx.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross the 2 reports, 1 critical finding was reported. It is marked fixed by the firm that reported it.
Open Anito Legends’s security record

Security firm

HashEx

118 projects reviewed · 159 reports · latest Feb 2025

See HashEx’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us