Dex Finance security record
As of 3 Nov 2026, Dex Finance has 3 audit reports by 3 security firms on Trustblock; the latest is by Zellic, dated 19 May 2025. Those reports list no open critical findings. It also holds 1 deployed contract on 1 chain.
Record last updated . It holds audits, findings and contracts up to Nov 2026, and incidents up to Oct 2026. Trustblock does not review code.
Audits3
Newest first
| Audit | Security firm | Date | Scope | Critical findings | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DexFi security assessment | Security firm: Zellic | Date: | Scope: Not recorded (see the report) | No open critical findings | Open · GitHub |
| Dex Finance / DEX | Security firm: Hacken | Date: | Scope: 1 address on Arbitrum | No open critical findings | Open · hacken.io |
| DEX Finance (dexVAULTS & dex ETF) | Security firm: CertiK | Date: | Scope: Files named in the report | 1 critical finding, fixed | Open · skynet.certik.com |
Findings20
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from each report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| High | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Medium | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Low | 0 | 1 | 12 |
HighCentralization Related RisksDEX Finance (dexVAULTS & dex ETF) · CertiK · 1 Mar 2023Open
In the contract `DexFiLPZapper` the role `_owner` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram below. Any compromise to the `_owner` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority.  In the contract `DexFiTreasury` the role `_owner` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram below. Any compromise to the `_owner` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority.  In the contract `DexFiVault` the role `_owner` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram below. Any compromise to the `_owner` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority.  In the contract `DexFiVaultFactory` the role `_owner` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram below. Any compromise to the `_owner` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority.  In the contract `DexFiVaultProfitStorage` the role `vault` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram below. Any compromise to the `vault` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority.  In the contract `DexFiFarmOutsidePoolConnector` the role `vault` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram below. Any compromise to the `vault` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority.  In the contract `DexShareRewardPoolConnector` the role `vault` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram below. Any compromise to the `vault` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority.  In the contract `PancakeMasterPoolConnector` the role `vault` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram below. Any compromise to the `vault` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority.  In the contract `DexFiETF` the role `_owner` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram below. Any compromise to the `_owner` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority.  In the contract `DexFiETFZapper` the role `_owner` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram below. Any compromise to the `_owner` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority.  In the contract `OwnerSourceManagement` the role `_owner` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram below. Any compromise to the `_owner` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority.  In the contract `DexFiVaultHarvester` the role `keeper` has authority over the function `harvest()`, which harvests rewards and pays the `keeper` for the service. Any compromise to the `keeper` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority. In the contract `VaultHarvesterDebtManagement` the role `harvester` has authority over the function `increaseHarvesterDebt()`, which increases the amount that needs to be paid to the `keeper` for harvesting. Any compromise to the `harvester` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority. In commit [64b0850cccc1cfc1464064d63db9d235baf5f1e1](https://github.com/dexfinance-com/vaults-pro/commit/64b0850cccc1cfc1464064d63db9d235baf5f1e1), the role `_owner` is added to the contract `DexFiVaultZapper`. The role `_owner` has authority over the functions listed below: - `addTokensWhitelis
Open the reportContracts1
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0xda064d44871ba31dae33a65b3e23b37e44e9168a | Chain: Arbitrum | Source code: Verified source |
Show this on your site
Is this your project? Show this record on your own website. The label states what the record holds, links to this page and updates by itself. It is free and needs no sign-in.
Content
Automatic: the three strongest facts of this project’s own record (its last audit and two more), highlighted. They update with the record. Picking a fact turns Automatic off.
Style
Format
<head><script src="https://widget.trustblock.run/project-widget.min.js" defer></script></head><body><divdata-tb-project-widgetdata-tb-project-slug="dex-finance"></div></body>
Paste the code where the label should appear. It uses no API credit and updates by itself.
Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us