Iztar security record

BNB Chainiztar.io

As of 29 Oct 2026, Iztar has 1 audit report on Trustblock, by HashEx, dated 6 Jun 2024. That report lists no open critical findings. It also holds 2 deployed contracts on 1 chain.

Critical findings
No open critical findings
In that report, 1 critical finding was reported. It is marked fixed by the firm that reported it. See the findings
Open the latest report
Your label, live
Get the label for your site

Record last updated . It holds audits and findings, contracts and incidents up to Oct 2026. Trustblock does not review code.

Audits1

Newest first

AuditSecurity firmDateScopeCritical findingsReport
Iztar

Audit

Security firm: HashExDate: Scope: 2 addresses on BNB Chain1 critical finding, fixedOpen · hashex.org

Findings24

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from each report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical001
High107
Medium007
Low107
HighNo guarantees that there will be enough tokens to withdrawIztar · HashEx · 6 Jun 2024Open

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowGas optimizationsIztar · HashEx · 6 Jun 2024Open

The report gives no description here.

Open the report

Contracts2

AddressChainSource code
Chain: BNB ChainSource code: Verified source
Chain: BNB ChainSource code: Verified source

Show this on your site

Is this your project? Show this record on your own website. The label states what the record holds, links to this page and updates by itself. It is free and needs no sign-in.

Content

Facts

Automatic: the three strongest facts of this project’s own record (its last audit and two more), highlighted. They update with the record. Picking a fact turns Automatic off.

Fixed as
Language

Style

Layout
Theme
Accent
Corners

Format

Size
Date
Embed as
HTML
<head>
	<script src="https://widget.trustblock.run/project-widget.min.js" defer></script>
</head>
<body>
	<div
		data-tb-project-widget
		data-tb-project-slug="iztar"
	></div>
</body>

Paste the code where the label should appear. It uses no API credit and updates by itself.

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us