Incident
Incident,
Source: De.Fi incident database.
- Audits before it
- 36.
- Audits since
- 6, the latest dated 2 Jul 2026.
1inch Network security record
As of 30 Oct 2026, 1inch Network has 42 audit reports by 13 security firms on Trustblock; the latest is by Hexens, dated 2 Jul 2026. Those reports list 2 open critical findings. It also holds 1 deployed contract on 1 chain and 1 incident (latest 6 Mar 2025).
Critical findings
2 open critical findings
Reported in “1inch Liquidity Protocol” by Consensys, Dec 2020. Not marked fixed in that report. See the findings
Incident
Incident 6 Mar 2025
Source: De.Fi incident database. 6 audits have been published since. See the incident
Open the latest report
Your label, live
Get the label for your siteRecord last updated . It holds audits and findings, contracts and incidents up to Oct 2026. Trustblock does not review code.
Audits42
Newest first
| Audit | Security firm | Date | Scope | Critical findings | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1inch security review | Security firm: Hexens | Date: | Scope: Not recorded (see the report) | No open critical findings | Open · GitHub |
| 1inch security review | Security firm: Hexens | Date: | Scope: Not recorded (see the report) | No open critical findings | Open · GitHub |
| 1inch Crosschain security review | Security firm: Hexens | Date: | Scope: Not recorded (see the report) | No open critical findings | Open · GitHub |
| 1inch Crosschain security review | Security firm: Hexens | Date: | Scope: Not recorded (see the report) | 1 critical finding, fixed | Open · GitHub |
| 1inch Crosschain security review | Security firm: Hexens | Date: | Scope: Not recorded (see the report) | No open critical findings | Open · GitHub |
| 1inch Fusion | Security firm: Quantstamp | Date: | Scope: Files named in the report | No open critical findings | Open · certificate.quantstamp.com |
| 1inch Sol security review | Security firm: Hexens | Date: | Scope: Not recorded (see the report) | 1 critical finding, fixed | Open · GitHub |
| Cross Chain Swaps Audit | Security firm: OpenZeppelin | Date: | Scope: Files named in the report | No open critical findings | Open · blog.openzeppelin.com |
| 1inch Settlement Refactor Audit | Security firm: OpenZeppelin | Date: | Scope: Files named in the report | No open critical findings | Open · blog.openzeppelin.com |
| 1inch Limit Order and Aggregation Protocols Diff A | Security firm: OpenZeppelin | Date: | Scope: Files named in the report | No open critical findings | Open · blog.openzeppelin.com |
| 1inch Limit Order Protocol Diff Audit | Security firm: OpenZeppelin | Date: | Scope: Files named in the report | No open critical findings | Open · blog.openzeppelin.com |
| 1inch Aggregation Protocol Diff Audit | Security firm: OpenZeppelin | Date: | Scope: Files named in the report | No open critical findings | Open · blog.openzeppelin.com |
| 1inch Limit Order Settlement Audit | Security firm: OpenZeppelin | Date: | Scope: Files named in the report | No open critical findings | Open · blog.openzeppelin.com |
| 1inch Fusion V2 audit | Security firm: Decurity | Date: | Scope: Not recorded (see the report) | No open critical findings | Open · GitHub |
| 1inch Cross Chain Swaps audit | Security firm: Decurity | Date: | Scope: Not recorded (see the report) | No open critical findings | Open · GitHub |
| 1inch security review | Security firm: Hexens | Date: | Scope: Not recorded (see the report) | No open critical findings | Open · GitHub |
| 1inch Limit Order Settlement Phase II audit | Security firm: ABDK Consulting | Date: | Scope: Not recorded (see the report) | No open critical findings | Open · GitHub |
| 1inch Limit Order Settlement audit | Security firm: ABDK Consulting | Date: | Scope: Not recorded (see the report) | No open critical findings | Open · GitHub |
| 1inch Fusion v1 | Security firm: OXORIO | Date: | Scope: Repository at commit f975e2e | No open critical findings | Open · audits.oxor.io |
| 1inch – Limit Order | Security firm: ChainSecurity | Date: | Scope: Files named in the report | No open critical findings | Open · chainsecurity.com |
| 1inch – Delegation | Security firm: ChainSecurity | Date: | Scope: Files named in the report | No open critical findings | Open · chainsecurity.com |
| 1inch – ERC20 | Security firm: ChainSecurity | Date: | Scope: Files named in the report | No open critical findings | Open · chainsecurity.com |
| 1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit | Security firm: ABDK Consulting | Date: | Scope: Not recorded (see the report) | 2 critical findings, fixed | Open · GitHub |
| 1inch Smart Contract Review (2nd iteration) | Security firm: Zokyo | Date: | Scope: Files named in the report | No open critical findings | Open · IPFS |
| 1inch Exchange AggregationRouter V5 | Security firm: Consensys | Date: | Scope: Files named in the report | No open critical findings | Open · diligence.security |
Findings474
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from each report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| High | 3 | 19 | 22 |
| Medium | 17 | 29 | 43 |
| Low | 50 | 136 | 148 |
HighvalidateImmutables won’t work on zkSync1inch Cross Chain Swaps audit · Decurity · 15 Mar 2024Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportHighPreventing low-level technical errors, such as overflows, via high-level business constraints is a bad practice, as such relations are non obvious and could be broken unintentional1inch Limit Order Settlement Phase II audit · ABDK Consulting · 19 Jun 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportHighUnclear behavior in FusionDetails.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement Phase II audit · ABDK Consulting · 19 Jun 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportHighOverflow/Underflow in Settlement.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportHighSuboptimal in OrderSaltParser.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportHighSuboptimal in WhitelistRegistry.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportHighpodCallGasLimit can not be customized in ERC20Pods1inch Fusion v1 · OXORIO · 28 Dec 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportHighThere is no possibility to customize _POD_CALL_GAS_LIMIT in DelegatedShare1inch Fusion v1 · OXORIO · 28 Dec 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportHighThere is no validation of maxUserFarms in RewardableDelegationPod1inch Fusion v1 · OXORIO · 28 Dec 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportHighThere is no validation of podCallGasLimit_ in ERC20Pods1inch Fusion v1 · OXORIO · 28 Dec 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportShow 10 more
HighThere is no value for maxLoss in the constructor of the St1Inch contract1inch Fusion v1 · OXORIO · 28 Dec 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportHighUntitled finding1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit · ABDK Consulting · 16 Sep 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportHighUntitled finding1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit · ABDK Consulting · 16 Sep 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportHighCentralization RiskAcknowledged
In the contract `ERC1155Proxy`, the role `immutableOwner` has the authority over the following function: - `func_301JL5R()`, which transfers tokens in an ERC1155 contract. Any compromise to the `immutableOwner` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this and gain unauthorized access to token transfers.
HighCentralization RiskAcknowledged
In the contract `ERC721Proxy`, the role `immutableOwner` has the authority over the following function: - `func_602HzuS()`, which transfers NFT tokens in an ERC721 contract. Any compromise to the `immutableOwner` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this and gain unauthorized access to token transfers.
HighCentralization RiskAcknowledged
In the contract `ERC721ProxySafe`, the role `immutableOwner` has the authority over the following function: - `func_602HzuS()`, which transfers NFT tokens in an ERC721 contract. Any compromise to the `immutableOwner` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this and gain unauthorized access to token transfers.
HighUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
HighUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
HighUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
MediumMissing Overflow Check on Timelocks Allows Escrow Lockout1inch Crosschain security review · Hexens · 5 Aug 2025Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportShow 10 more
MediumMissing Timelock Ordering Validation Allows Malicious Order Creation1inch Crosschain security review · Hexens · 5 Aug 2025Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportMediumPotential Bypass of Fees Parameters in Order Creation1inch Fusion · Quantstamp · 24 Mar 2025Acknowledged
In the `Create` context of the fusion-swap program, makers are required to specify protocol fee and integrator fee parameters as well as their corresponding associated token accounts (protocol_dst_ata and integrator_dst_ata). However, the current implementation does not enforce these parameters strictly. This means that a maker can potentially create an order without setting protocol or integrator fees or by misconfiguring the protocol_dst_ata. Consequently, the maker might avoid fee deductions and receive a higher net amount than intended by the protocol fee design. Note that even if the UI enforces fee parameters, malicious makers could bypass these checks by directly interacting with the program. While this issue might be less impactful because takers (or resolvers) must be whitelisted by the protocol and are incentivized to fill only orders with correct fee configurations, it still poses a risk. In practice, resolvers may refuse to fill orders that do not have fees applied to the correct token accounts, but the absence of on-chain enforcement or fixed values allows makers to manipulate these parameters.
Open the reportMediumPotential Surplus Fee Bypass via Inflated `estimated_dst_amount` in `get_fee_amounts()`1inch Fusion · Quantstamp · 24 Mar 2025Acknowledged
In the `get_fee_amounts()` function of the fusion-swap program, surplus fees are conditionally applied based on the comparison between the calculated destination amount (after applying the Dutch auction adjustments and subtracting the protocol and integrator fees) and the user-supplied `estimated_dst_amount`. Specifically, the surplus fee is added only if the adjusted destination amount exceeds the `estimated_dst_amount`. This design allows a maker to avoid the impact of surplus fees by setting the `estimated_dst_amount` to an excessively high value relative to `min_dst_amount`. As a result, the condition to trigger the surplus fee is never met, and the protocol fee component intended to capture surplus (positive slippage) is effectively bypassed.
Open the reportMediumINSECURE RESCUE MECHANISM FOR STUCK TOKENS1inch security review · Hexens · 6 Nov 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportMediumMAKING AN UNLIMITED APPROVAL FOR UNOSWAPROUTER TO ANY ADDRESS1inch security review · Hexens · 6 Nov 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportMediumOverflow, underflow, and division by zero are possible here.1inch Limit Order Settlement Phase II audit · ABDK Consulting · 19 Jun 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportMediumThis could read after “extraData”.1inch Limit Order Settlement Phase II audit · ABDK Consulting · 19 Jun 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportMediumOverflow/Underflow in Settlement.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportMediumOverflow/Underflow in Settlement.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportMediumOverflow/Underflow in Settlement.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportShow 10 more
MediumOverflow/Underflow in Settlement.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportMediumOverflow/Underflow in VotingPowerCalculator.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportMediumSuboptimal in BasicDelegationPod.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportMediumSuboptimal in BasicDelegationPod.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportMediumSuboptimal in ERC20Pods.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportMediumSuboptimal in VotingPowerCalculator.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportMediumUnclear behavior in Settlement.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportMediumIncorrect comparison in WhitelistRegistry1inch Fusion v1 · OXORIO · 28 Dec 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportMediumPod is not removed after withdrawal of all tokens from St1Inch1inch Fusion v1 · OXORIO · 28 Dec 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportMediumThe promote function is not authorized in WhitelistRegistry1inch Fusion v1 · OXORIO · 28 Dec 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportShow 10 more
MediumStaking Does Not Prevent Misbehavior1inch – Limit Order · ChainSecurity · 19 Dec 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportMediumUntitled finding1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit · ABDK Consulting · 16 Sep 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportMediumUntitled finding1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit · ABDK Consulting · 16 Sep 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportMediumUntitled finding1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit · ABDK Consulting · 16 Sep 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportMediumUntitled finding1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit · ABDK Consulting · 16 Sep 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportMediumPotential Reentrancy AttackAcknowledged
A reentrancy attack can occur when the contract creates a function that makes an external call to another untrusted contract before resolving any effects. If the attacker can control the untrusted contract, they can make a recursive call back to the original function, repeating interactions that would have otherwise not run after the external call resolved the effects.
MediumPotential Reentrancy AttackAcknowledged
A reentrancy attack can occur when the contract creates a function that makes an external call to another untrusted contract before resolving any effects. If the attacker can control the untrusted contract, they can make a recursive call back to the original function, repeating interactions that would have otherwise not run after the external call resolved the effects.
MediumUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowDirection not enforced for 1->0-only adjustment instructions1inch security review · Hexens · 9 Mar 2026Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowFee-on-Transfer Tokens Cause Accounting Mismatch and Maker Loss1inch security review · Hexens · 9 Mar 2026Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportShow 10 more
LowToken pair not bound when direction-only validation is used1inch security review · Hexens · 9 Mar 2026Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowThe order and escrow are not closed after the escrow is rescued1inch Crosschain security review · Hexens · 11 Jul 2025Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowConsider Validating the `authority` of the `taker_src_ata` Account1inch Fusion · Quantstamp · 24 Mar 2025Acknowledged
The protocol does not enforce the `authority` constraint on the `taker_src_ata` account. This allows the taker to provide any account as long as the `mint` constraint is correct, which can lead to fund loss if an incorrect address is provided.
Open the reportLowImproper Slippage Handling1inch Fusion · Quantstamp · 24 Mar 2025Acknowledged
The protocol allows the maker to set a `min_dst_amount` during order creation. By definition, this amount represents the minimum destination tokens the maker is willing to receive in exchange for source tokens. However, the protocol currently uses this amount to calculate exchange rates via the `get_dst_amount()` function and then deducts fees from the calculated amount using the `get_fee_amounts()` function. However, under certain conditions—particularly when the calculated fees (protocol, integrator, and surplus) exceed the bump provided by the Dutch auction—the resulting destination amount for the maker may fall below the intended `min_dst_amount`. This behavior effectively breaks the slippage protection mechanism. Makers expect `min_dst_amount` to represent the minimum amount of destination tokens they will receive, but due to the fee calculations, they may receive less than this minimum.
Open the reportLowLack of Monotonicity Enforcement in Dutch Auction Rate Bumps1inch Fusion · Quantstamp · 24 Mar 2025Acknowledged
The protocol documentation specifies that the auction operates on a Dutch auction model, where the price is expected to decline over time. However, in the `calculate_rate_bump()` function in `fusion-swap/src/dutch_auction.rs`, there is no check to ensure that the rate bumps specified by the user in `points_and_time_deltas` are in a strictly declining order. This omission allows a user to supply rate bump values that could be non-monotonic (i.e., a subsequent bump could be higher than a previous one), which contradicts the intended Dutch auction behavior and the protocol documentation.
Open the reportLowMissing Input Validation1inch Fusion · Quantstamp · 24 Mar 2025Acknowledged
The fusion-swap program currently allows makers to supply fee parameters via the `ReducedFeeConfig` and rate bump values in the Dutch auction data without performing explicit bound checks. Unlike the surplus fee—which is validated to be less than `BASE_1E2`—there is no on-chain validation to ensure that: - The protocol fee and integrator fee values (or their sum) are within a reasonable range (e.g., less than or equal to `BASE_1E5`). Without this check, makers could specify arbitrarily high fees, potentially leading to unintended pricing behavior and potential underflow when substracting the fees from the `dst_amount`. - The rate bumps provided in the Dutch auction parameters are within an acceptable range relative to `BASE_1E5`. This extra validation would help prevent overflow in the `calculate_rate_bump()` function and ensure that the auction price adjustment behaves as intended.
Open the reportLowIncomplete expiration_time check allows orders to be instantly expired1inch Sol security review · Hexens · 21 Feb 2025Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowMaker and taker assets can be identical1inch Sol security review · Hexens · 21 Feb 2025Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowProtocol fee associated token account is not checked against a configured account1inch Sol security review · Hexens · 21 Feb 2025Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowSelf-exchange is possible1inch Sol security review · Hexens · 21 Feb 2025Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportShow 10 more
LowFloating PragmaCross Chain Swaps Audit · OpenZeppelin · 14 Nov 2024Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowGas OptimizationCross Chain Swaps Audit · OpenZeppelin · 14 Nov 2024Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowMakers May Profit off of Takers via Malicious makerPermit Extension1inch Limit Order Protocol Diff Audit · OpenZeppelin · 23 May 2024Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowProcedural in DynamicSuffix.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement Phase II audit · ABDK Consulting · 19 Jun 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowProcedural in FeeBank.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement Phase II audit · ABDK Consulting · 19 Jun 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowProcedural in FeeBankCharger.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement Phase II audit · ABDK Consulting · 19 Jun 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowProcedural in Settlement.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement Phase II audit · ABDK Consulting · 19 Jun 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowSpecifying as particular version makes it harder to migrate to newer versions.1inch Limit Order Settlement Phase II audit · ABDK Consulting · 19 Jun 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowSuboptimal in FeeBank.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement Phase II audit · ABDK Consulting · 19 Jun 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowThe function always returns true and the semantics of the returned value is unclear.1inch Limit Order Settlement Phase II audit · ABDK Consulting · 19 Jun 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportShow 10 more
LowThis error gives no clue regarding which particular address is zero.1inch Limit Order Settlement Phase II audit · ABDK Consulting · 19 Jun 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowWe didn’t review this file.1inch Limit Order Settlement Phase II audit · ABDK Consulting · 19 Jun 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowWe didn’t review this file.1inch Limit Order Settlement Phase II audit · ABDK Consulting · 19 Jun 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowBad datatype in ERC20Pods.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowBad datatype in IERC20Pods.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowBad datatype in IERC20Pods.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowBad datatype in IERC20Pods.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowDocumentation in FeeBankCharger.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowDocumentation in IResolver.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowDocumentation in ISettlement.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportShow 10 more
LowDocumentation in RewardableDelegationPod-1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowDocumentation in Settlement.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowDocumentation in WhitelistRegistry.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowDocumentation in WhitelistRegistry.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowOverflow/Underflow in Settlement.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowProcedural in ERC20Pods.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowProcedural in IDelegatedShare.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowProcedural in ISettlement.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowProcedural in St1inch.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowProcedural in WhitelistRegistry.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportShow 10 more
LowReadability in ERC20Pods.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowReadability in Settlement.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowSuboptimal in ERC20Pods.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowSuboptimal in ERC20Pods.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowSuboptimal in ERC20Pods.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowSuboptimal in ERC20Pods.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowSuboptimal in ERC20Pods.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowSuboptimal in ERC20Pods.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowSuboptimal in FeeBank.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowSuboptimal in FeeBankCharger.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportShow 10 more
LowSuboptimal in FeeBankCharger.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowSuboptimal in IDelegatedShare.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowSuboptimal in IDelegationPod.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowSuboptimal in St1inch.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowSuboptimal in St1inch.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowSuboptimal in St1inch.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowSuboptimal in WhitelistRegistry.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowSuboptimal in WhitelistRegistry.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowUnclear behavior in DynamicSuffix.sol1inch Limit Order Settlement audit · ABDK Consulting · 28 Feb 2023Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowIt is possible to call _mint with zero value in St1Inch1inch Fusion v1 · OXORIO · 28 Dec 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportShow 10 more
LowOrders with fee can be reverted in Settlement1inch Fusion v1 · OXORIO · 28 Dec 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowPromoted address can not be removed in WhitelistRegistry1inch Fusion v1 · OXORIO · 28 Dec 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowrateBump is not calculated in tests1inch Fusion v1 · OXORIO · 28 Dec 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowRedundant allowance after resolve of the order in Settlement1inch Fusion v1 · OXORIO · 28 Dec 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowThe delegate function does not revert when prevDelegatee equals new delegatee in BasicDelegationPod1inch Fusion v1 · OXORIO · 28 Dec 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowThe withdraw and withdrawTo functions do not revert when lock amount equals 0 in St1inch1inch Fusion v1 · OXORIO · 28 Dec 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowThere is a possibility of overflow in Settlement1inch Fusion v1 · OXORIO · 28 Dec 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowThere is no validation of variables in Settlement1inch Fusion v1 · OXORIO · 28 Dec 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowConsistency on Zero Amount Transfers1inch – ERC20 · ChainSecurity · 19 Dec 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowMissing Events1inch – Limit Order · ChainSecurity · 19 Dec 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportShow 10 more
LowSide Effects of _updateBalances()1inch – ERC20 · ChainSecurity · 19 Dec 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowZero Address Consistency in AddressArray1inch – ERC20 · ChainSecurity · 19 Dec 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowUntitled finding1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit · ABDK Consulting · 16 Sep 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowUntitled finding1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit · ABDK Consulting · 16 Sep 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowUntitled finding1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit · ABDK Consulting · 16 Sep 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowUntitled finding1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit · ABDK Consulting · 16 Sep 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowUntitled finding1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit · ABDK Consulting · 16 Sep 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowUntitled finding1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit · ABDK Consulting · 16 Sep 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowUntitled finding1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit · ABDK Consulting · 16 Sep 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowUntitled finding1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit · ABDK Consulting · 16 Sep 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportShow 10 more
LowUntitled finding1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit · ABDK Consulting · 16 Sep 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowUntitled finding1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit · ABDK Consulting · 16 Sep 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowUntitled finding1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit · ABDK Consulting · 16 Sep 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowUntitled finding1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit · ABDK Consulting · 16 Sep 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowUntitled finding1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit · ABDK Consulting · 16 Sep 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowUntitled finding1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit · ABDK Consulting · 16 Sep 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowUntitled finding1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit · ABDK Consulting · 16 Sep 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowUntitled finding1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit · ABDK Consulting · 16 Sep 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowUntitled finding1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit · ABDK Consulting · 16 Sep 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowUntitled finding1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit · ABDK Consulting · 16 Sep 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportShow 10 more
LowUntitled finding1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit · ABDK Consulting · 16 Sep 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowUntitled finding1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit · ABDK Consulting · 16 Sep 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowUntitled finding1inch Aggregation Router V5 audit · ABDK Consulting · 16 Sep 2022Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Open the reportLowInefficient Transfer HookAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowInsufficient DocumentationAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Show 10 more
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Show 10 more
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Show 10 more
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Show 4 more
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowUntitled findingAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Incidents1
Attached through a shared contract address. Our incident data ends in Oct 2026.
Contracts1
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0x111111111117dc0aa78b770fa6a738034120c302 | Chain: Ethereum | Source code: Verified source |
Show this on your site
Is this your project? Show this record on your own website. The label states what the record holds, links to this page and updates by itself. It is free and needs no sign-in.
Content
Automatic: the three strongest facts of this project’s own record (its last audit and two more), highlighted. They update with the record. Picking a fact turns Automatic off.
Style
Format
<head><script src="https://widget.trustblock.run/project-widget.min.js" defer></script></head><body><divdata-tb-project-widgetdata-tb-project-slug="1inch"></div></body>
Paste the code where the label should appear. It uses no API credit and updates by itself.
Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us