Injective security record

As of 21 Oct 2026, Injective has 3 audit reports by 2 security firms on Trustblock; the latest is by HashEx, dated 6 Aug 2024. Those reports list no open critical findings. It also holds 1 deployed contract on 1 chain.

Critical findings
No open critical findings
Across the 3 reports, 2 critical findings were reported. Each is marked fixed by the firm that reported it. See the findings
Open the latest report
Your label, live
Get the label for your site

Record last updated . It holds audits and findings, contracts and incidents up to Oct 2026. Trustblock does not review code.

Audits3

Newest first

AuditSecurity firmDateScopeCritical findingsReport
InjectiveSecurity firm: HashExDate: Scope: 1 address on EthereumNo open critical findingsOpen · hashex.org
Ninja auditSecurity firm: Oak SecurityDate: Scope: Not recorded (see the report)1 critical finding, fixedOpen · GitHub
Injective auditSecurity firm: Oak SecurityDate: Scope: Not recorded (see the report)1 critical finding, fixedOpen · GitHub

Findings23

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from each report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical002
High032
Medium000
Low0313
HighInventory imbalance under certain parameter constellations will disable the risk management frameworkNinja audit · Oak Security · 20 Jan 2023Acknowledged

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
HighPrice threshold for price invalidity is prone to manipulation and might lead to full loss of users funds in case of a breakdown of a market or an assetNinja audit · Oak Security · 20 Jan 2023Acknowledged

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
Highregistry contract and wasmx module are not aware of registered contract migrationsInjective audit · Oak Security · 20 Jan 2023Acknowledged

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowBackward looking volatility can lead to inefficient pricingNinja audit · Oak Security · 20 Jan 2023Acknowledged

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowMath utils do not follow best practicesNinja audit · Oak Security · 20 Jan 2023Acknowledged

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowVault contract invocations should be prevented prior to registration with master contractNinja audit · Oak Security · 20 Jan 2023Acknowledged

The report gives no description here.

Open the report

Contracts1

AddressChainSource code
0xe28b3b32b6c345a34ff64674606124dd5aceca30Chain: EthereumSource code: Verified source

Show this on your site

Is this your project? Show this record on your own website. The label states what the record holds, links to this page and updates by itself. It is free and needs no sign-in.

Content

Facts

Automatic: the three strongest facts of this project’s own record (its last audit and two more), highlighted. They update with the record. Picking a fact turns Automatic off.

Fixed as
Language

Style

Layout
Theme
Accent
Corners

Format

Size
Date
Embed as
HTML
<head>
<script src="https://widget.trustblock.run/project-widget.min.js" defer></script>
</head>
<body>
<div
data-tb-project-widget
data-tb-project-slug="injective"
></div>
</body>

Paste the code where the label should appear. It uses no API credit and updates by itself.

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us