Injective security record

As of 21 Oct 2026, Injective has 3 audit reports by 2 security firms on Trustblock; the latest is by HashEx, dated 6 Aug 2024. Those reports list no open critical findings. It also holds 1 deployed contract on 1 chain.

Critical findings
No open critical findings
Across the 3 reports, 2 critical findings were reported. Each is marked fixed by the firm that reported it. See the findings
Open the latest report
Your label, live
Get the label for your site

Record last updated . It holds audits and findings, contracts and incidents up to Oct 2026. Trustblock does not review code.

Audits3

Newest first

AuditSecurity firmDateScopeCritical findingsReport
InjectiveSecurity firm: HashExDate: Scope: 1 address on EthereumNo open critical findingsOpen · hashex.org
Ninja auditSecurity firm: Oak SecurityDate: Scope: Not recorded (see the report)1 critical finding, fixedOpen · GitHub
Injective auditSecurity firm: Oak SecurityDate: Scope: Not recorded (see the report)1 critical finding, fixedOpen · GitHub

Findings23

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from each report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical002
High032
Medium000
Low0313
CriticalContract creators can update the gas price into invalid integer value in order to disable the wasmx’s BeginBlocker executionInjective audit · Oak Security · 20 Jan 2023Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
CriticalFees held by spot vault are locked foreverNinja audit · Oak Security · 20 Jan 2023Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
HighGovernance is not able to effectively remove a contract from registryInjective audit · Oak Security · 20 Jan 2023Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
HighValid positions may be rejected prior the application of PnLInjective audit · Oak Security · 20 Jan 2023Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowA dependency is vulnerable to two CVEsNinja audit · Oak Security · 20 Jan 2023Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowConsider validating max contract gas limit is higher than the minimum execution gas limitInjective audit · Oak Security · 20 Jan 2023Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowCustom calls between Cosmos SDK modules and CosmWasm contractsNinja audit · Oak Security · 20 Jan 2023Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowCustom calls between Cosmos SDK modules and CosmWasm contracts requires third party developers to implement their own authorization logicInjective audit · Oak Security · 20 Jan 2023Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowInsufficient validation of addresses in configsNinja audit · Oak Security · 20 Jan 2023Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowInteger gas price type allows negative valuesInjective audit · Oak Security · 20 Jan 2023Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
Show 7 more
LowLarge order_density could lead to the execution running out of gasNinja audit · Oak Security · 20 Jan 2023Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowMessage attributes are defined and stored with type inconsistencyNinja audit · Oak Security · 20 Jan 2023Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowParameter space of derivative vault config is loosely validatedNinja audit · Oak Security · 20 Jan 2023Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowQuery does not implement a pagination mechanismNinja audit · Oak Security · 20 Jan 2023Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowToo many contracts registered would cause GetContracts and GetActiveContracts query messages to failInjective audit · Oak Security · 20 Jan 2023Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowUpdating Ninja token address may cause state conflictsNinja audit · Oak Security · 20 Jan 2023Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report
LowVault contracts ownership cannot be transferredNinja audit · Oak Security · 20 Jan 2023Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Open the report

Contracts1

AddressChainSource code
0xe28b3b32b6c345a34ff64674606124dd5aceca30Chain: EthereumSource code: Verified source

Show this on your site

Is this your project? Show this record on your own website. The label states what the record holds, links to this page and updates by itself. It is free and needs no sign-in.

Content

Facts

Automatic: the three strongest facts of this project’s own record (its last audit and two more), highlighted. They update with the record. Picking a fact turns Automatic off.

Fixed as
Language

Style

Layout
Theme
Accent
Corners

Format

Size
Date
Embed as
HTML
<head>
<script src="https://widget.trustblock.run/project-widget.min.js" defer></script>
</head>
<body>
<div
data-tb-project-widget
data-tb-project-slug="injective"
></div>
</body>

Paste the code where the label should appear. It uses no API credit and updates by itself.

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us